Damico v. Lundberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “error [in a civil matter] is reversible only when, considering all the facts peculiar to the particular case under scrutiny, it is reasonably probable that a result more favorable to the appellant would have been reached if the error had not been committed”
• requiring appellant to show that error complained of was harmful, or that “it is reasonably probable that a result more favorable to the appellant would have been reached if the error had not been committed”
• error is reversible only when, considering all facts of the case, it is reasonably probable that a result more favorable to the appellant would have been reached if the error had not been committed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).