Damick v. Planning & Zoning Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• improper for court to use evidence in its findings beyond limited scope for which it permitted evidence to be introduced
• when court used evidence and testimony for purposes beyond limited ones for which it had permit- ted admission into evidence, such misuse was imper- missible
• where change of zonal classification was for sole benefit of individual and was detrimental to others, change was at odds with comprehensive plan.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).