Damiano v. Matish

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a federal court exercising supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims applies state law as it would when exercising diversity jurisdiction
• dealing with the somewhat different Pennsylvania medical malpractice tribunal procedure, the court held that diversity jurisdiction could, in effect, be postponed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).