· 1/8/1991
D'Amato v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
Citations
- 585 A.2d 580
- 137 Pa. Commw. 157
- 1991 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 24
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Economic loss occasioned by owners who build structures which do not comply with the zoning requirements does not justify a variance.”
- variation of approximately 13% from open area requirement is not de minimis
- 13% reduction in required open space was not de minimis
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Economic, Narick, Palladino, Pellegrini, Phrases, Planning, Property, See, Violation, Words, Zoning
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.