Skip to main content
· 1/8/1991

D'Amato v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Citations

  • 585 A.2d 580
  • 137 Pa. Commw. 157
  • 1991 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 24

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Economic loss occasioned by owners who build structures which do not comply with the zoning requirements does not justify a variance.”
  • variation of approximately 13% from open area requirement is not de minimis
  • 13% reduction in required open space was not de minimis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Economic, Narick, Palladino, Pellegrini, Phrases, Planning, Property, See, Violation, Words, Zoning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.