Daly v. Kiel
Citations
- 106 La. 170
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. One cannot be understood as contracting to take upon himself risks which are not apparent, and of which he has not been informed or warned against at the time of his employment.</p> <p>2. The warning required to be given is an unequivocal' one. It should not be left to inference. The situation should be explained, the danger pointed out, and the employee cautioned to be on his guard.</p> <p>3. When this is not done, and the danger develops, becomes real and actual and the servant is injured, the master is answerable in damages.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining the courts of appeals for Second, Fourth, and Ninth Circuits have held Section 1692g does not require a dispute to be in writing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blanchard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.