Daly v. Hellman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, after Thompson, that even though “executive pardons and judicial expungement orders are not specifically listed in Heck,” a “full pardon, even one that does not indicate an individual is innocent, fulfills the purposes of Heck’s invalidation requirement”
• “To prove malicious prosecution, a plaintiff must show “termination of the prior criminal proceeding in favor of the accused.”
• “Heck did not impose a prerequisite of innocence to seek relief under § 1983. Instead, it gave examples of state procedures amounting to invalidation of a conviction. . . . [N]one of the examples in Heck require innocence or complete elimination of the fact of conviction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).