Skip to main content
· 1/7/2003

Daly v. Far Eastern Shipping Co. PLC.

Citations

  • 238 F. Supp. 2d 1231
  • 60 Fed. R. Serv. 1436
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 914
  • 2003 WL 102613

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Rebuttal evidence is admissible only where the need for it could 18 not have been foreseen at the time the plaintiff presented its case-in-chief.”
  • “Rebuttal evidence is allowed to permit a litigant to counter new, unforseen facts brought out in the other side’s case.”’
  • “[The] potential 20 testimony does not necessitate a new trial because most of it is inadmissible and 1 because the portions that are admissible would not have changed the outcome of 2 the trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coughenour

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.