Skip to main content
· 5/22/1902

Daly v. Dallmeyer

Citations

  • 20 Pa. Super. 366
  • 1902 Pa. Super. LEXIS 240

Syllabus

<p>Evidence — Receipt in full — Contract.</p> <p>In an notion upon a written agreement of employment, where the defendant sets up various subsequent oral agreements which are alleged to have superseded the written agreement, and these oral agreements, although denied by the plaintiff, are corroborated by receipts in full of the plaintiff, which show on their face that they were given under the oral agreements, binding instructions for the defendant are proper, although the plaintiff testifies that at the time of signing, he said he receipted only on account, but “ had to have money to live on,” and, therefore, signed the receipt.</p>

Judges: Beaver, Orlady, Porter, Rice

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.