Skip to main content
· 12/31/1969

Dalton v. City and County of Honolulu

Citations

  • 462 P.2d 199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • standing found where plaintiffs resided “in very close proximity” to property alleged to have been improperly rezoned.
  • allowing adjoining property owners to bring a declaratory judgment action to declare ordinances enacted by the City and County of Honolulu as unconstitutional
  • allowing adjoining property owners to bring a declaratory judgment action to declare ordinances enacted by the City and County of Honolulu as unconstitutional
  • conferring standing upon neighboring landowners based on their interest in safeguarding scenic view, sense of space, and population density due to adjacent highrise development
  • conferring standing upon neighboring landowners based on their interest in safeguarding scenic view, sense of space, and population density due to adjacent high-rise development
  • “[Fjindings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary in summary judgments. This is because disputed issues of fact cannot be resolved on summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, C.J., Abe, Levinson and Kobayashi, Jj., and Hawkins, Circuit Judge, in Place of Marumoto, J., Disqualified

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.