Skip to main content
· 11/16/1995

Dalrymple v. United Services Automobile Ass'n

Citations

  • 40 Cal. App. 4th 497
  • 46 Cal. Rptr. 2d 845
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 15249
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8814
  • 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 1122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “an insurer can erroneously dispute coverage without acting in bad faith”
  • \an insurer can erroneously dispute coverage without acting in bad faith\
  • “an insurer can erroneously dispute coverage without acting in bad faith”
  • “an insurer can erroneously dispute coverage without acting in bad faith”
  • “Although the evidence showed [the insured] had psychotic reasons for shooting, it was a reasonable interpretation of the evidence to conclude the shooting itself was calculated and deliberate and thus not accidental within the meaning of the policy provision occurrence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.