Skip to main content
· 9/25/1959

Dalrymple v. Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Co.

Citations

  • 24 F.R.D. 260
  • 2 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 705
  • 1959 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that contention interrogatories can be a more efficient method to obtain information regarding affirmative defenses because affirmative defenses are drafted by attorneys and “asking a 30(b)(6
  • noting interrogatories may be the best option to conduct contention discovery rather than by deposition
  • noting interrogatories may be the best option to conducting contention discovery and if a deposition in needed, ordering a “more convenient, less burdensome and less expensive” Rule 31 deposition upon written questions rather than a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition
  • noting interrogatories may be the best option to conducting contention discovery and if a deposition in needed, ordering a “more convenient, less burdensome and less expensive” Rule 31 deposition upon written questions rather than a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marsh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.