· 9/25/1959
Dalrymple v. Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Co.
Citations
- 24 F.R.D. 260
- 2 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 705
- 1959 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4195
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that contention interrogatories can be a more efficient method to obtain information regarding affirmative defenses because affirmative defenses are drafted by attorneys and “asking a 30(b)(6
- noting interrogatories may be the best option to conduct contention discovery rather than by deposition
- noting interrogatories may be the best option to conducting contention discovery and if a deposition in needed, ordering a “more convenient, less burdensome and less expensive” Rule 31 deposition upon written questions rather than a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition
- noting interrogatories may be the best option to conducting contention discovery and if a deposition in needed, ordering a “more convenient, less burdensome and less expensive” Rule 31 deposition upon written questions rather than a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marsh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.