Dallas v. Illinois Central Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• excluding an expert from opining on royalty records when the expert explicitly stated at his deposition that his report was based off incomplete data
• excluding opinion of expert who admitted “that he had failed to review all of the documents produced by [defendant] in the course of preparing his expert report”
• finding “introduction of additional expert testimony, after the close of expert discovery would unduly prejudice Defendants who have not been awarded the opportunity to prepare a rebuttal report or depose Ms. Crain regarding her opinions”
• “Under Rule 26, an expert’s report that does not rely on ‘any information that was previously unknown or unavailable to him,’ should not be considered a supplemental report.”
• \[M]ethodology ... aimed at achieving one result ... is unreliable.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).