Skip to main content
· 2/13/1967

Dallas Typographical Union, No. 173 v. A. H. Belo Corporation, A. H. Belo Corporation v. Dallas Typographical Union, No. 173

Citations

  • 372 F.2d 577
  • 64 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Torrington should be “carefully confined lest, under the guise of the arbitrator not having ‘authority’ to arrive at his ill-founded conclusions of law or fact, or both, the reviewing-enforcing court takes over the arbitrator’s function”
  • arbitrator may draw freely on principles akin to stare decisis, res judicata and collateral estoppel in related cases
  • enforce even though the arbitrator did not apply sound legal principles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Coleman, Ainsworth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.