· 2/13/1967
Dallas Typographical Union, No. 173 v. A. H. Belo Corporation, A. H. Belo Corporation v. Dallas Typographical Union, No. 173
Citations
- 372 F.2d 577
- 64 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2491
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Torrington should be “carefully confined lest, under the guise of the arbitrator not having ‘authority’ to arrive at his ill-founded conclusions of law or fact, or both, the reviewing-enforcing court takes over the arbitrator’s function”
- arbitrator may draw freely on principles akin to stare decisis, res judicata and collateral estoppel in related cases
- enforce even though the arbitrator did not apply sound legal principles
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Coleman, Ainsworth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.