Skip to main content
· 3/9/1949

Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. Rogers

Citations

  • 147 Tex. 617
  • 218 S.W.2d 456
  • 1949 Tex. LEXIS 451

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant did not exercise due diligence because he failed to apply for service of process for witness who was anticipated to testify

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smedley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.