Skip to main content
· 11/22/2013

Dallas Metrocare Services v. Adolfo Juarez

Citations

  • 420 S.W.3d 39
  • 57 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 93
  • 2013 WL 6128586
  • 2013 Tex. LEXIS 950

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding court of appeals erred in concluding that its review of the trial court’s jurisdictional ruling was limited to the grounds stated in the plea to the jurisdiction
  • holding governmental entity may raise new immunity arguments on appeal
  • “[A]n appellate court must consider all of a defendant’s immunity arguments, whether the governmental entity raised other jurisdictional arguments in the trial court or none at all.”
  • “[A]n appellate court must consider all of a defendant’s immunity arguments, whether the governmental entity raised other jurisdictional arguments in the trial court or none at all.”
  • “[A]n appellate court must consider all of a defendant’s immunity arguments, whether the governmental entity raised other jurisdictional arguments in the trial court or none at all.”
  • “[A]n appellate court must consider all of a defendant’s immunity arguments, whether the governmental entity raised other jurisdictional arguments in the trial court or none at all.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.