· 11/22/2013
Dallas Metrocare Services v. Adolfo Juarez
Citations
- 420 S.W.3d 39
- 57 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 93
- 2013 WL 6128586
- 2013 Tex. LEXIS 950
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding court of appeals erred in concluding that its review of the trial court’s jurisdictional ruling was limited to the grounds stated in the plea to the jurisdiction
- holding governmental entity may raise new immunity arguments on appeal
- “[A]n appellate court must consider all of a defendant’s immunity arguments, whether the governmental entity raised other jurisdictional arguments in the trial court or none at all.”
- “[A]n appellate court must consider all of a defendant’s immunity arguments, whether the governmental entity raised other jurisdictional arguments in the trial court or none at all.”
- “[A]n appellate court must consider all of a defendant’s immunity arguments, whether the governmental entity raised other jurisdictional arguments in the trial court or none at all.”
- “[A]n appellate court must consider all of a defendant’s immunity arguments, whether the governmental entity raised other jurisdictional arguments in the trial court or none at all.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.