Dallas Johnson v. Booker T. Washington Broadcasting Service, Inc., D.B.A. Wenn Radio, and David Donnell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff’s reference to fifteen separate instances of harassment over four months was frequent
• holding that harassment consisting of “roughly fifteen separate instances of harassment over the course of four months” was sufficiently pervasive
• holding that harassment consisting of “roughly fifteen separate instances of harassment over the course of four months” was frequent
• holding that employer is liable for co-worker harassment only if it “knew (actual notice) or should have known (constructive notice
• holding that the harassment at issue “was not infrequent” when the plaintiff pointed to “roughly fifteen separate instances of harassment over the course of four months”
• holding that where the parties present conflicting evidence regarding the identity of the decision-maker who took the tangible employment action, the parties have created “a classic dispute of a material fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).