Dallas Gas Partners, L.P. v. Prospect Energy Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring a party to raise an argument “to such a degree that the district court has an opportunity to rule on it” (quoting Keelan v. Majesco Software, Inc., 407 F.3d 332, 339–40 (5th Cir. 2005))
• requiring a party to raise an argument “to such a degree that the district court has an opportunity to rule on it” (quoting Keelan v. Majesco Software, Inc., 407 F.3d 332, 339–40 (5th Cir. 2005))
• permitting recovery of damages for breach of covenant not to sue measured by litigation expenses where “the lawsuits were clearly within the scope of the release and covenant not to sue” and thus were “in obvious breach” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• an “argument must be raised [at summary judgment] to such a degree that the district court has an opportunity to rule on it” (citation omitted)
• decided under New York law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).