Texas Supreme Court· 5/22/2009
Dallas County v. Posey
Citations
- 290 S.W.3d 869
- 52 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 782
- 2009 Tex. LEXIS 310
- 2009 WL 1427190
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “This nexus requires more than mere involvement of property; rather, the condition must actually have caused the injury.”
- the alleged condition must actually have caused the injury to invoke the Tort Claims Act’s immunity waiver; mere involvement of property is not sufficient
- “This nexus requires more than mere involvement of property; rather, the condition must actually have caused the injury.”
- “[T]he exposed wires in this case might have posed an electrical hazard to an ordinary user of the telephone.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rusk State Hospital v. BlackTexas Supreme Court· 2012-08-31· cited 489×
- John Sampson v. the University of Texas at AustinTexas Supreme Court· 2016-06-10· cited 280×
- City of Dallas v. Diane Sanchez, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Matthew Sanchez, and Arnold SanchezTexas Supreme Court· 2016-07-01· cited 225×
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas v. Estate of Arancibia Ex Rel. Vasquez-ArancibiaTexas Supreme Court· 2010-10-22· cited 125×
- Lenoir v. U.T. PhysiciansCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-03-29· cited 24×
- Rusk State Hospital v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-23· cited 18×
- University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2012-12-04· cited 14×
- City of Dallas v. Diane SanchezTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2014-10-27· cited 10×
- Connie Rogge, Individually and as Heir of Richard Hollas Rogge, Richard Rogge, Individually and as Heir of Richard Hollas Rogge and Richard Rogge as Administrator of the Estate of Richard Hollas Rogge v. the City of Richmond, TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2016-09-29· cited 5×
- the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center v. Roger ContrerasTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2019-05-07· cited 3×
- Bari Ruggeri and Robert Ruggeri v. Baylor College of MedicineTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2014-08-29
- Rusk State Hospital v. Dennis Black and Pam Black, Individually and as Representatives of the Estate of Travis Bonham BlackTexas Supreme Court· 2012-08-31
- Kurt Garrison v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2002-10-09
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2010-03-26
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2010-03-26
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2012-12-04
- Unnamed caseTexas Supreme Court· 2010-10-22
- Dallas Metrocare Services v. Juarez, AdolfoTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2014-06-30
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2010-06-23
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2010-06-23
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dallas Cty. Mental Health and Mental Retardation v. BossleyTexas Supreme Court· 1998-06-23· cited 685×
- Kerrville State Hospital v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court· 1996-07-08· cited 297×
- San Antonio State Hospital v. CowanTexas Supreme Court· 2004-01-09· cited 181×
- Southwest Key Program, Inc. v. Gil-PerezTexas Supreme Court· 2002-07-03· cited 159×
Other cases named Dallas County v. Posey
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.