Skip to main content
· 6/19/2002

Dallas County Hospital District v. Associates' Health & Welfare Plan

Citations

  • 293 F.3d 282
  • 28 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1403
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 12035
  • 2002 WL 1174250

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “ERISA does not countenance third-party beneficiary claims”
  • terms of an ERISA plan must be construed by considering the plan documents as a whole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duhé, Demoss, Clement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.