Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/19/1951
Dallas Borough Annexation Case
Citations
- 169 Pa. Super. 129
- 82 A.2d 676
- 1951 Pa. Super. LEXIS 439
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rules of construction applicable to deeds apply where a boundary line is disputed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Dithrich, Dithrioh, Gunther, Hirt, Reno, Rhodes, Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-07-02· cited 101×
- Doman v. BroganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-04-16· cited 50×
- Baker v. Roslyn Swim ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1965-09-16· cited 25×
- Pencil v. BuchartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-12-07· cited 14×
- Plum Township Annexation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-07-21· cited 14×
- Salisbury Township Annexation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-01-20· cited 11×
- Roth v. HalberstadtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-10-20· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. KeownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-02-27· cited 9×
- South Pymatuning Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1962-11-28· cited 6×
- Schroeder v. EngroffNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1959-10-22· cited 2×
- United States v. 0.08246 Acres of LandE.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-06-02· cited 1×
- Keto v. SchaeferFranklin County Court of Common Pleas· 1983-11-25
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.