Dalk v. Frank D. Black, Inc.
Citations
- 119 Wash. 368
- 206 P. 22
- 1922 Wash. LEXIS 827
Syllabus
<p>Contracts (86) — Construction—Building Contract. Proposals by a sash and door factory to furnish all window frames for a building do not include the priming coat, which the specifications required should he given before placing, where the proposals did not refer to the specifications or mention the painting.</p> <p>Custom: and Usages (6) — Evidence as to Existence oe Custom. The evidence of one witness that it was the custom of the plant with which he was familiar to put a priming coat on window frames and sash does not establish a general custom among mill work manufacturers to do so.</p> <p>Contracts (86) — Construction—Building Contracts. A proposal by a sash and door factory to furnish all mill work for a building, specifying the list of materials, consisting of doors, window sash frames, and so forth, including “all glass,” refers to the glass in the frames and sashes listed, and does not include skylight glass to be set in metallic frames not included in the proposals, or made by the factory.</p> <p>Contracts (92) — Performance—Reasonable Time. Where no time is stipulated for the furnishing of mill work for a building, it must be furnished within a reasonable time.</p>
Judges: Main
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.