Dalis v. Buyer Advertising, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, inter alia, that the plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial on both her ch. 151B and ch. 93, § 102 claims
• noting that a sex discrimination claim is \a suit between two persons which clearly sets forth a controversy concerning property\ and is \analogous to common law actions sounding in both tort and contract\
• noting that a sex discrimination claim is “a suit between two persons which clearly sets forth a controversy concerning property” and is “analogous to common law actions sounding in both tort and contract”
• “art. 15 does not guarantee a right to a trial by jury in the class of cases traditionally reserved for courts of equity”
• “plaintiff is constitutionally entitled to a trial by jury for her claim of employment discrimination based on sex”
• despite absence of specific statutory language, plaintiff entitled to jury trial on State claims for gender discrimination by employer, wage discrimination, and equal rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).