Daley v. Kashmanian
Citations
- 193 Conn. App. 171
Syllabus
The plaintiff sought to recover damages from the defendant police detective, K, and the defendant city of Hartford for personal injuries he sustained when he was ejected from his motorcycle after it was struck by K's unmarked vehicle, which was not equipped with flashing or revolving lights or a siren, while K was surveilling the plaintiff and traveling above the speed limit in the wrong lane of traffic. The plaintiff sought to recover damages on the basis of K's alleged reckless and negligent conduct, claiming that K's conduct violated a ministerial duty imposed on him by certain motor vehicle statutes. After the case was tried to a jury, the trial court granted K's motion for a directed verdict on the plaintiff's recklessness claim. The jury thereafter returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on his negligence claim. Subsequently, the trial court set aside the verdict on the negligence count, concluding that the plaintiff's allegations related to discretionary acts for which the defendants were immune from liability pursuant to the statute (§ 52- 557n) concerning governmental immunity. From the judgment rendered thereon, the plaintiff appealed to this court. Held: 1. The trial court improperly directed a verdict in favor of K as to the plaintiff's recklessness claim, as the evidence, viewed in a light most favorably to the plaintiff, was sufficient for the jury reasonably to con- clude that K acted recklessly: on the basis of the evidence presented, the jury reasonably could have concluded that K consciously disregarded state laws relating to speed limits, reckless driving, following too closely and traveling in the correct lane of traffic in a situation in which a high degree of danger was present, and that he was aware of the risks and dangers his conduct imposed on others, yet showed little regard for the consequences of his actions; accordingly, the plaintiff was entitled to have his recklessness claim submitted to the jury. 2. The trial court properly set
Judges: Keller; Bright; Harper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Borelli v. RenaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-06-24· cited 24×
- Cookish v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-10-20· cited 8×
- Daley v. KashmanianSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-08-30· cited 6×
- Doe v. FlaniganConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-11-24· cited 4×
- Doe v. New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2022-08-23· cited 4×
- Borelli v. RenaldiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-02-16
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wei Ping Wu v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-21· cited 125×
- City of Jackson v. LipseyMississippi Supreme Court· 2003-01-09· cited 79×
- Matthiessen v. VanechSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-12-16· cited 70×
- Thomas v. Department of Developmental ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-07-13· cited 46×
- Curran v. KrollSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-03-13· cited 32×
- Jones v. LathramKentucky Supreme Court· 2005-01-31· cited 27×
- Adams v. PeoplesOhio Supreme Court· 1985-07-10· cited 22×
- Northrup v. WitkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-07-02· cited 21×
- Williams v. Hous. Auth. of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2017-12-26· cited 17×
- Flax v. United StatesD. New Jersey· 1994-01-12· cited 15×
- Brooks v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-02-02· cited 15×
- O'Connor v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-02-06· cited 7×
Other cases named Daley v. Kashmanian
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.