Dalebout v. Union Pacific Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that to admit medical testimony about future treatments, the plaintiff must “introduce evidence to demonstrate that the future event will more likely than not occur” (quotations and citations omitted) (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).