Skip to main content
· 9/5/2006

Dale Helmig, Petitioner-Appellee/cross v. Michael Kemna, Respondent-Appellant/cross

Citations

  • 461 F.3d 960
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 22564
  • 2006 WL 2528582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Vigil, holding that “to warrant relief [on a juror misconduct claim], [a] habeas petitioner . . . must prove that the [extraneous information] was both extraneous and prejudicial,” and refusing to apply to a state habeas case a presumption of jury prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Melloy, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.