Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corp. v. Schieffer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that stay would substantially harm a party by denying that party its contractual right to arbitrate, even though that party waited a year and a half to demand arbitration
• noting that “‘trial courts have issued or stayed injunctions pending appeal where such action was necessary to preserve the status quo where the legal questions were substantial and matters of first impression’” (quoting Sweeney v. Bond, 519 F. Supp. 124, 132 (E.D. Mo. 1981
• noting that “‘trial courts have issued or stayed injunctions pending appeal where such action was necessary to preserve the status quo where the legal questions were substantial and matters of first impression’” (quoting Sweeney v. Bond, 519 F. Supp. 124, 132 (E.D. Mo. 1981

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).