Daka, Inc. v. McCrae

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it is “most probably right” that “negligent supervision . . . requires logically antecedent proof of a tort committed by the supervised employee”
• affirming the jury’s finding of retaliation because “the jury could readily find that retaliation was a factor substantially contributing to” the plaintiff’s transfer and ultimate termination (citing Arthur Young, 631 A.2d at 369-70)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).