Daisy Group, Ltd. v. Newport News, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an accounting of defendant’s profits pursuant to Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a) was a remedy “fundamentally compensatory and legal in nature,” and was therefore to be resolved by jury
• noting plaintiff did not dispute that its claim for attorneys’ fees was equitable in nature and did not entitle it to a jury trial
• granting jury trial on ground that plaintiff sought “profits as a rough proxy measure of its damages”
• “It is undisputed that the [Lanham Act] is silent on the issue of jury trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).