Skip to main content
· 2/16/1955

Daisy D. Blankenship v. Maxwell Rowntree

Citations

  • 219 F.2d 597
  • 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2948

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a memorandum prepared by a client and delivered to his attorney by an agent of the client was a privileged communication
  • recognizing an exception to the general rule “where position or wealth is necessarily involved in determining dam- ages sustained”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bratton, Huxman, Murrah

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.