Skip to main content
· 7/28/1972

Dairyland Insurance v. Implement Dealers Insurance

Citations

  • 199 N.W.2d 806
  • 294 Minn. 236
  • 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting an endorsement must prevail in the event of a conflict with the main policy
  • restating prior holdings that unambiguous insurance contracts are to be enforced as written
  • the language of insurance contracts “must be given its ordinary and usual meaning so as to give effect to the intention of the parties as it appears from the contract”
  • an insurance policy must be construed according to the terms the parties have used, and the language used must be given its ordinary and usual meaning so as to give effect to the intention of the parties as it appears from the contract
  • an insurance policy must be construed according to the terms the parties have used, and the language used must be given its ordinary and usual meaning so as to give effect to the intention of the parties as it appears from the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Knutson, MacLaughlin, Todd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.