Dairyland Insurance Company v. Lopez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that consent-to-settle clauses are void in the UM context because, pursuant to statute, UM coverage is mandatory
• holding that consent-to-settle clauses are void in the UM context because, pursuant to statute, UM coverage is mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).