Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating court should uphold jury verdict unless jury’s finding is “ ‘so plainly unreasonable as to convince the court that no jury acting fairly and reasonably could make [such a] finding’ ” (citation omitted)
• exclusion of statement was harmless because plaintiff failed to show that introduction of excluded testimony would have enhanced its case
• exclusion of statement was harmless because plaintiff failed to show that introduction of excluded testimony would have enhanced its case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).