Dairyland Insurance Co. v. East

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] named insured exclusion endorsement is invalid with respect to the minimum coverage amounts required by the . . . [MVSRL]” but that “[a]bove the minimum amounts of coverage required by West Virginia Code § 17D-4-12 (1992
• holding that “[a] named insured exclusion endorsement is invalid with respect to the minimum coverage amounts required by the . . . [MVSRL]” but that “[a]bove the minimum amounts of coverage required by West Virginia Code § 17D-4-12 (1992) . . . the endorsement remains valid”
• “A named insured exclusion endorsement is invalid with respect to the minimum coverage amounts required by the West Virginia Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Law, West Virginia Code §§ 17D-1-1 to 17D-6-7 (1991 & Supp.1992

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).