Dairyamerica, Inc. v. Carlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \A.H.'s accommodation requests are unreasonable\ under Martin and that requested accommodation of \lower[ing] the qualifying times for State by creating a new division of runners would fundamentally alter the essential nature\ of track-and-field meets
• recognizing the “provisions and implementing regulations of the Rehabilitation Act and the ADA are ‘materially identical’” (quoting another source)
• noting that courts construe and apply both statutes in a consistent manner because their relevant provisions and implementing regulations are “materially identical”
• recognizing corresponding language in Title II regulations and Title III
• reaffirming the long-standing principle after Severson that the reasonableness inquiry regarding a requested accommodation is fact specific and made on a case-by-case basis
• noting that the plaintiff must show that “’but for’ his disability, he would have been able to access the services or benefits desired” (citing Wisconsin Cmty. Servs., Inc. v. City of Milwaukee, 465 F.3d 737, 752 (7th Cir. 2006))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).