Daimlerchrysler v. The Net Inc., Keith Maydak Michael Sussman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an intent to divert can be inferred from the use of a domain name that is phonetically identical to the mark owner’s trademark
• finding that irreparable harm is “presumed” upon a showing that a defendant infringed a plaintiff’s mark
• findings defendant’s “foradodge.com” domain name confusingly similar to the plaintiff’s distinctive and famous DODGE mark
• affirming grant of summary judgment, finding bad faith based on allegations that “1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).