Skip to main content
· 3/18/2004

Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. United States

Citations

  • 361 F.3d 1378
  • 26 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1001
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5158
  • 2004 WL 530732

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, even if dictum, court \would feel obligated to follow the Supreme Court's explicit and carefully considered statements\
  • noting that, even if a Supreme Court statement were dicta, the Federal Circuit \would feel obligated to follow the Supreme Court's explicit and carefully considered statements\
  • “[I]t is not only the result but also those portions of the opinion necessary to that result by which we are bound.” (quoting Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44, 67 (1996))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clevenger, Dyk, Prost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.