· 3/18/2004
Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. United States
Citations
- 361 F.3d 1378
- 26 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1001
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5158
- 2004 WL 530732
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, even if dictum, court \would feel obligated to follow the Supreme Court's explicit and carefully considered statements\
- noting that, even if a Supreme Court statement were dicta, the Federal Circuit \would feel obligated to follow the Supreme Court's explicit and carefully considered statements\
- “[I]t is not only the result but also those portions of the opinion necessary to that result by which we are bound.” (quoting Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44, 67 (1996))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clevenger, Dyk, Prost
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.