Skip to main content

DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Spitzer

Citations

  • 860 N.E.2d 705
  • 7 N.Y.3d 653
  • 827 N.Y.S.2d 88

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recounting manufacturers’ concession under the statute that “a consumer whose vehicle has been out of service for 30 or more days gains the presumption regardless of whether the vehicle is fixed after the 30-day mark”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graffeo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

143 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Spitzer

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.