DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that relevant information requests are presumed to have been made in good faith \until the company demonstrates otherwise\
• memo to employee that could be read as threatening “discipline for any future request for information” violates Act (emphasis added)
• “The Board presumes that requests for presumptively relevant information are made in good faith, until the company demonstrates otherwise.”
• discussing Collyer Insulated Wire, 192 NLRB 837 (1971)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).