Skip to main content
· 1/9/2003

Daimlerchrysler Ag Mercedes-Benz Usa, Inc. v. Donald H. Bloom Mbz Communications, Inc.

Citations

  • 315 F.3d 932
  • 65 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1359
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 291
  • 2003 WL 61110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assuming without deciding that elements of proof under the Minnesota common law trademark and federal Lanham Act claims “are coextensive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hansen, Fagg, Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.