Skip to main content
· 12/11/2013

Daimler Trucks North America LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency

Citations

  • 407 U.S. App. D.C. 262
  • 737 F.3d 95
  • 43 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20265
  • 2013 WL 6487281
  • 77 ERC (BNA) 1657
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 24597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the court typically vacates rules when an agency ‘entirely fail[s]’ to provide notice and comment”
  • vacating where the “EPA entirely failed to provide notice of its intention to amend its regulation . . . and offered no persuasive evidence that possible objections to its final rule have been given sufficient consideration” (cleaned up)
  • “[T]he court typically vacates rules when an agency ‘entirely fail[s]’ to provide notice and comment . . . .” (first alteration in original) (quoting Shell Oil Co. v. EPA, 950 F.2d 741, 752 (D.C. Cir. 1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Rogers, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.