· 12/11/2013
Daimler Trucks North America LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency
Citations
- 407 U.S. App. D.C. 262
- 737 F.3d 95
- 43 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20265
- 2013 WL 6487281
- 77 ERC (BNA) 1657
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 24597
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the court typically vacates rules when an agency ‘entirely fail[s]’ to provide notice and comment”
- vacating where the “EPA entirely failed to provide notice of its intention to amend its regulation . . . and offered no persuasive evidence that possible objections to its final rule have been given sufficient consideration” (cleaned up)
- “[T]he court typically vacates rules when an agency ‘entirely fail[s]’ to provide notice and comment . . . .” (first alteration in original) (quoting Shell Oil Co. v. EPA, 950 F.2d 741, 752 (D.C. Cir. 1991))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Rogers, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.