Skip to main content
· 2/24/2014

Daily v. Florida

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 1351
  • 188 L. Ed. 2d 353
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3494
  • 571 U.S. 1227
  • 2014 WL 684470
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1051

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Louisiana’s relation-back doctrine as applied to the substitution of plaintiffs is governed by” Giroir
  • no prejudice where no impact on defendant’s access to relevant proof
  • citing, inter alia,Gomez v. Toledo, 446 U.S. 635, 640 (1980)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.