Daily Med. Equip. Distrib. Ctr., Inc. v. ELRAC, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an IJ’s conclusion about a noncitizen’s likelihood of facing torture is a factual finding subject to clear-error review by the BIA
• IJ findings regarding likelihood of future events, including torture under the CAT, are factual findings
• CAT applicant must show specific grounds exist indicating she would personally be at risk and cannot rely on an unsupported hypothetical “chain of assumptions” related to mass human-rights abuses
• treating the more-likely-than-not finding as a fact question
• treating the more-likely-than-not finding as a fact question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).