· 9/15/1982
Dailey v. Sundance Ranches, Inc.
Citations
- 59 Or. App. 142
- 650 P.2d 994
- 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3201
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that there was no valid dedication because there was no order or petition in the town clerk’s records
- finding that there was no valid dedication because there was no order or petition in the town clerk’s records
- “The common and ordinary use establishing the right to an easement by prescription limits and qualifies it so that it cannot be given to different uses and purposes.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoomissen, Richardson, Thornton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.