Dailey v. Norton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff was not “otherwise qualified” because of the “extensive and well documented record of her absenteeism”
• regular attendance at work is \an essential requirement of virtually all employment\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• prong 3 unsatisfied where plaintiff with chronic medical condition “fail[ed] to identify a reasonable accommodation that would allow her to achieve regular and predictable attendance at work”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).