Dailey v. City of Seattle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that “the acquiescence of the employees concerned is to be presumed where some advantages have been sacrificed to gain compensating or greater benefits”
• reasoning that \the acquiescence of the employees concerned is to be presumed where some advantages have been sacrificed to gain compensating or greater benefits\
• reasoning that \the acquiescence of the employees concerned is to be presumed where some advantages have been sacrificed to gain compensating or greater benefits\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).