Dahlstrom v. Shrum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• negligent motorist owed no duty of care to an involuntary spectator injured by his tortious acts
• “The test of negligence is whether the wrongdoer could have anticipated and foreseen the likelihood of harm to the injured person, resulting from his act.”
• “The test of negligence is whether the wrongdoer could have anticipated and foreseen the likelihood of harm to the injured person, resulting from his act[.]” (citations omitted)
• motorist owed no duty of care to injured pedestrian who, while standing behind a parked bus, was struck by body of deceased who was fatally injured by motorist while crossing highway

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).