Dagenett v. Jenks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding district court’s refusal to allow transit authority employee to supplement his opposition papers with sur-reply, after deadline for filing papers had passed on employer’s motion for summary judgment, was not abuse of discretion
• upholding the district court's denial of leave to file a reply because the movant did not have a sufficient excuse for his failure to request an extension
• upholding the district court’s refusal to accept a late filing under Rule 6 because counsel’s explanation did not address why he could not have requested an extension before the deadline passed
• upholding the district court’s refusal to accept a late filing under Rule 6 because counsel’s explanation did not address why he could not have requested an extension before the deadline passed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).