Dagel v. Lemcke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the trial court's denial of a motion to compel certain discovery prior to ruling on a motion for summary judgment when the requested discovery was \immaterial\ to the disposition of the motion
• “The statement that the action reported by WXIA ‘smacks of illegality’ does not, standing alone, impute the commission of any specific crime to Dagel.”
• trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that additional discovery was immaterial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).