Daewoo Engineering and Const. Co., Ltd. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the determination that a contractor committed fraud when it knowingly submitted a claim, based upon a “baseless calculation” as a negotiating ploy
• quot- ing Commercial Contractors v. United States, 154 F.3d 1357, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 1998)
• “The [Government must establish ... falsity and intent by a preponderance of the evidence.”
• “The [G]ov-ernment must establish this falsity and intent by a preponderance of the evidence.”
• “The [Government must establish this falsity and intent by a preponderance of the evidence.”
• “The Court of Federal Claims did not err in concluding that Daewoo violated the False Claims Act. Because the court did not find that the government incurred damages from Daewoo’s false claim, the court properly assessed only the statutory penalty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).