Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the inquiry is whether the record reasonably supports an agency's decision, not whether some other reasonable inference exists
• explaining that substantial evidence may include “reasonable inferences from the record”
• “The question is whether the record adequately supports the decision of [Commerce], not whether some other inference could reasonably have been drawn.”
• “The questions is whether the record adequately supports the decision of the [agency], not whether some other inference could reasonably be drawn.”
• “When the issue is the validity of a regulation issued under a statute that an agency is charged with administering, it is well established that the agency’s construction is entitled to great weight.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).